IN
THIS ISSUE:
Incidence
and Prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse
Spotlight from MCC's "State Call To Action: Working to
End Child Abuse and Neglect in Massachusetts"
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sexual abuse of a child is defined as inappropriately subjecting
or exposing a child to sexual contact, activity, or behavior.
Non-touching sexual offenses include indecent exposure or exhibitionism,
exposing children to pornographic material, deliberately exposing
a child to the act of sexual intercourse and/or masturbation
in front of a child. Touching offenses include sexual fondling,
making a child touch an adult's sexual organs, forcing a child
to engage in sexual intercourse or activity. Sexual exploitation
of children can include engaging a child for the purposes of
prostitution or using a child to film or model pornography.
Nationwide,
reports of child sexual abuse declined from an estimated 425,000
in 1991 to an estimated 223,000 in 1997. In considering any
declines, it is important to remember that only a subset of
child sexual abuse cases are actually identified or reported
to child protective services each year. Researchers estimate
that as many as 85 percent of child sexual abuse cases are never
reported to authorities.
Retrospective
surveys are now supporting the estimate that at least 20 percent,
and possibly higher, of all American women and 5 percent to
16 percent of American men experience some form of sexual abuse
as children. If the number of sexually abused children today
is as great as the number of adults who claim to have been child
victims, we can then conclude that less than one-third of sexually
abused children are being currently identified and reported.
Declines
in reports may be completely or partly due to factors that are
not related to the actual incidence of sexual abuse. For example,
"child abuse backlash" reported by some researchers may play
a role. The dominant and incorrect message to the public has
often been that false allegations are frequent and that innocent
people are unfairly stigmatized. As a result, media coverage
of child sexual abuse cases may be fueling a more skeptical
attitude toward the problem than in the past and causing the
public and professionals to be more reluctant to report such
cases. Legislative initiatives to increase the rights of alleged
perpetrators have also taken hold in certain states and, as
a result, victims may be more reluctant to seek help.
A number
of other factors may account for the decrease in investigations
and substantiation of cases after they are reported. For example:
- The required level of evidence is not possible to meet because
the child victim is too young to communicate, or the abuser
is also a child.
- Child protective services may be excluding cases of extra-familial
child sexual abuse and redefining their definition of "caretaker"
to exclude non- immediate family members. These cases may
be referred directly to the police, eliminating child protective
services involvement.
- Cases involving adolescent victims or offenders may also
be referred to the police.
- More stringent screening practices by child protective
service workers may be turning away less serious cases and
raising the threshold for cases needing investigation.
- State investigators may be more conservative in the criteria
they use to substantiate cases because they fear entanglement
in an appeals process, particularly when able counsel represent
alleged offenders.
- Structured risk-assessment protocols may be substituting
clinical judgments about whether or not the abuse should be
substantiated. Such protocols could result in accurate judgments.
However, if they are based solely on meeting legal burdens
of proof, more children are likely to remain in dangerous
situations.
A review
of national incidence studies by researcher David Finkelhor
found that girls are sexually abused three times more often
than boys. Despite the public's perception that highly publicized
cases of sexual assaults by teachers, clergymen and other unrelated
adults are the norm, they make up less than 10 percent of sexual
assaults against children. According to child abuse researchers,
in 90 percent of child sexual abuse cases, the child knows and
trusts the person who commits the abuse. Most sexual abusers
are fathers, mothers, stepparents, grandparents and other family
members or adults who have close contact with the child.
Sexual abuse
exists in low, middle, and high-income families across the state.
There are no markers to help us identify when sexual abuse is
more likely to occur. However, some studies show that the most
important indicator of risk for sexual abuse is the compromised
ability of a parent to provide adequate supervision to their
child, e.g. marital conflicts, unavailability, substance abuse.
The factors that reduce appropriate parental supervision can
also produce emotionally vulnerable children who in turn can
fall prey more easily to sexual abusers offering affection,
attention, and friendship.
The effects
of sexual abuse on children can be devastating and long-term,
especially when timely and effective treatment is not available.
A variety of studies show that sexually abused children can
experience a chronic self-perception of helplessness, hopelessness,
depression, impaired trust, self-blame, self-destructive behavior,
and low self-esteem. Anger and emotional distress are also cited,
as well as alcohol and drug dependency when the child reaches
adolescence or adulthood.
FOR MORE
INFORMATION about child sexual abuse, MCC's recommendations
for change, and source reference notes for the above spotlighted
section, please see "A State Call To Action: Working to End
Child Abuse and Neglect in Massachusetts," Section II, Chapter
1, Incidence and Prevalence [http://www.masskids.org/cta/cta_i_ch01.html
]
The complete
report is available online at http://www.masskids.org/cta/
Child
Sexual Abuse Prevention Initiative
Coming up in April.
-----------------------------------------------------------
MCC will soon be launching its Child Sexual Abuse Prevention
Initiative. Look for public service announcements with information
on how to obtain free sexual abuse prevention brochures. More
to come in April's issue of the Campaign for Children newsletter.
Remember,
April is Child Abuse Prevention Month!
MCC
and Others Support A Mother's Efforts to Keep Her Daughters
in Massachusetts
Child Advocates File Amicus Briefs
-----------------------------------------------------------
MCC recently filed an amicus curiae brief (friend-of-the- court
brief) in the U.S. Federal Court of Appeals in support of a
mother who moved her daughters to the U.S. from Sweden to protect
them from further abuse by their father. The brief was filed
to address a lower court’s ruling that the mother must return
her two children to Sweden for further evaluation—a decision
made despite the judge's finding that the psychologist treating
the three- year-old child was "credible in her report" of the
child's disclosures of sexual abuse by her father.
MCC filed
the brief joined by the Women's Bar Association, Jane Doe Inc.,
the Domestic Violence Council, Inc., Greater Boston Legal Services
and Dr. Rebecca Bolen of Boston University. MCC argued that
the evidence of sexual abuse at the trial, which included compelling
disclosures to the child's therapist, the expert opinions of
Dr. Carole Jenny and Dr. Bessel Van Der Kolk, clearly and convincingly
met the "gold standard" for determining that the child had been
sexually abused.
Another
group of child advocacy organizations filed an amicus curiae
brief, arguing that the lower court failed to take into consideration
the short and long-term effects of child sexual abuse. This
group consisted of the Leadership Council for Mental Health,
MSPCC, Children's Law Center of Massachusetts, Inc., Gloucester
Men Against Domestic Abuse, and Emerge, Inc., and the Community
Legal Services and Counseling Center.
A third
brief was filed by the Massachusetts Office of the Attorney
General. Their brief argued that child abuse includes a wide
range of contact and non-contact offenses, and that a young
child’s disclosures of sexual abuse may be assessed using a
well-recognized set of indicia of reliability.
The filing
of these briefs represents an important collaboration among
child advocacy groups, the legal profession and experts on child
sexual abuse. Massachusetts Citizens for Children is currently
continuing its efforts to address the issue of court responses
to child sexual abuse, in its fall "Summit on Children and the
Courts: Court Responses to Intra-Familial Violence" and in its
developing Children's Law and Policy Initiative.
A recent
PNN Online article featured this important and controversial
trial: http://pnnonline.org/people/children022502.asp
For more
information about the amicus curiae brief or the upcoming Summit
on Children and the Courts, please contact Nora Sjoblom Sanchez,
Esq., of MCC’s Children’s Law and Policy Initiative, at Nora@masskids.org.
New
Version of MassCHIP Now Available
Updated Data and New Data Sets
-----------------------------------------------------------
A new version (v2.8 r265) of the Department of Public Health's
on-line interactive data warehouse, MassCHIP, has recently been
released. The new version contains four new Instant Topics,
including updated Massachusetts KIDS COUNT data, and the just-released
2000 birth data. A new data set has been added which contains
a count by specialty of licensed physicians practicing in Massachusetts.
Of special note in MassCHIP is the new Youth Risk Behavior Survey,
the Department of Education's survey that asked high school
students about such issues as violence and risk behaviors.
KIDS COUNT,
a project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation, is a national and
state-by-state effort to track the status of children in the
United States. Mass. Citizens for Children and the Mass. Department
of Public Health are working in partnership to increase the
accessibility of KIDS COUNT data to the public. The KIDS COUNT
data in the MassCHIP database is available at the city/town
level and at higher aggregates, such as county.
MassCHIP
may be obtained by going to the website and registering as a
user, then downloading the system onto your computer. MassCHIP
is distributed completely free of charge by the Massachusetts
Department of Public Health.
The MassCHIP
web site is http://masschip.state.ma.us/
An
Act to End Child Hunger in Massachusetts (S722, H2183)
Pending Legislation
Would Take Advantage of Federal Funding and Already Existing
Programs to Eliminate Child Hunger
-----------------------------------------------------------
As a solution to the increasing problem of child hunger, Project
Bread has filed An Act to End Child Hunger in Massachusetts
(S722, H2193). This legislation, if passed, would guarantee
children the opportunity to eat wherever they live, work, and
play, while bringing in millions of federal dollars to a cash-strapped
economy. The passage of this legislation would enable Massachusetts
to become a leader in ending child hunger-but our legislature
must act quickly, because the bill will expire on July 31, 2002.
The basis
for An Act to End Child Hunger is that resources to end child
hunger are already close at hand. An expansive network of child
nutrition programs already exists, and when Massachusetts draws
on those resources, most of the expense is covered by the federal
government. By accessing available federal funding for these
programs, a state investment of $29.7 million would garner up
to $120 million in federal funds; in other words, the federal
government would add $4 to every $1 Massachusetts invests to
eliminate child hunger.
At the best
of times, one in five children under the age of 12 lives in
a family that finds it challenging to put food on the table.
According to Project Bread, a non- profit organization that
has been intensively exploring strategies to end child hunger
in Massachusetts, this number is growing. When Project Bread
surveyed state emergency food shelters, one hundred percent
of them reported seeing more hungry children in January 2002,
than they did in January 2001. In addition, Project Bread's
FoodSource Hotline has seen a significant increase in calls.
An Act to
End Child Hunger in Massachusetts would ensure that all at-risk
children in the state have the opportunity to access food where
they live, learn, and play: these children would eat at home,
in school and after-school programs, and in summer recreation
programs. Not in soup kitchens. It provides a safety net for
children that is seamless and invisible, removing stigma and
allowing parents to focus on regaining control of their economic
lives.
The bill,
first filed by Project Bread on December 6, 2000, currently
remains stalled in the Committees on Ways and Means in both
the House and Senate. Because of the impending expiration date
of July 31, passage of the bill requires that it be addressed
quickly. Citizens may demonstrate their support of this legislation
to their legislators by participating in Project Bread's postcard
campaign: postcards may be ordered from Project Bread's web
site, www.projectbread.org, then filled out, and returned to
Project Bread for delivery to the State House.
To take
action online, via e-mail or postal mail, please visit the MCC
Online Advocacy Center: http://capwiz.com/pca/ma/issues/alert/?alertid=103352&type=ST
To learn
more about An Act To End Child Hunger in Massachusetts, and
the Massachusetts Child Hunger Initiative, please visit the
Project Bread web site,
www.projectbread.org.
----------------------------------------------------------
The Massachusetts
Campaign for Children is a program of Massachusetts Citizens
for Children. Its mission is to build and maintain a statewide,
grassroots membership organization, which can then become a
powerful voice for the children of our state. The Campaign's
goal is to engage in non-partisan electoral and legislative
actions at the local and state levels that promote the well-being
of all Massachusetts children, youth, and their families, and
help us move children's issues to the center of every political
arena.
We believe
that all our children have the right: to be free from poverty;
to get the medical and preventive care they need; to learn in
quality child care and school settings; to be safe from abuse,
neglect, and violence; and to live in caring families and healthy
communities.
Please share
this newsletter with your friends and colleagues, and urge them
to join with us to become a powerful voice for the children
of our state. We urge you, too, to join with us, or renew your
membership if you are already a member. The Campaign for Children
is a non-profit independent advocacy organization, and we receive
no state or federal funding. We rely entirely on the generosity
of our members and donors. Please visit www.masskids.org
to join online; or call 800-CHILDREN for a free information
packet.
* * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Massachusetts Campaign for Children
14 Beacon Street, Suite 706 . Boston, MA 02108 . 617-742-8555
. campaign@masskids.org
Deborah Ferreri, Campaign for Children Coordinator . deborah@masskids.org
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
To subscribe
to this newsletter please visit our web site at www.masskids.org,
or send an email to subscribe@masskids.org. To unsubscribe please
send an email to unsubscribe@masskids.org.